今天上的課程內容是RDA，我雖然已經把教授放在網頁的RDA連結複製下來了，但是卻沒有複製詳細的RDA檔案，所以當教授在介紹RDA裡的章節時，我手忙腳亂，想從網站上複製檔案，但是網路因為太多人使用，所以連不上網路，試了很多次都沒有辦法，又要一邊聽教授講解，一邊連結網路，所以很多地方都沒聽清楚，又因為沒有講義，所以只能用打的，不能複製貼上，浪費了很多時間。經過這次上課，給了我一個教訓，告訴我下次上課除了要準備教授放在網路上的連結，也要注意相關的檔案有沒有需要複製。
課堂筆記
RDA: Resource Description
and Access資源描述和檢索
於2010年6月正式出版，以 Drupal 安裝成資料庫的形式，需要付費才能取得帳號及密碼。
自許為新的編目標準，已經將完稿發交出版社印刷，將於2009年取代英美編目規則第二版。資源描述和檢索從幾個層面超越以往的編目規則，它是編目電子資源的基準，並更強調對使用者的協助，包括查找、辨識、選擇和取得所需的資訊。資源描述和檢索還支援書目記錄的叢集，顯示作品與作者的關係。這個重要的新特點是一項令人振奮的發展，讓使用者更清楚作品的各版本、翻譯或物理形式。
資源描述和檢索提供數位與傳統資源的編目規定，把圖書館推向數位時代。它建立在英美編目規則第二版的強項上，重視使用者便捷地找尋、辨識、選擇與取用其所需的資料，它支援多個後設資料社群的後設資料共享，以及在圖書館記錄在線上服務的新用途。
＊RDA provides a set of guidelines and instructions on recording data
to support resource discovery.
The data
created using RDA to describe a resource are designed to assist users
performing the following tasks:1
RDA所建立的書目資料是用來描述協助讀者執行下列動作
find—i.e., to
find resources that correspond to the user’s stated search criteria
identify—i.e.,
to confirm that the resource described corresponds to the resource sought, or
to distinguish between two or more resources with similar characteristics
select—i.e.,
to select a resource that is appropriate to the user’s needs
選擇資源
obtain—i.e.,
to acquire or access the resource described.拿到資源
根據final report 1998年
＊The
data created using RDA to describe an entity associated with a resource (a
person, family, corporate body, concept, etc.) are designed to assist users
performing the following tasks:2
find—i.e., to find information on that entity and
on resources associated with the entity
identify—i.e., to confirm that the entity
described corresponds to the entity sought, or to distinguish between two or
more entities with similar names, etc.
clarify—澄清i.e., to clarify the relationship between two or
more such entities, or to clarify the relationship between the entity描述關係與名字described and a name by which that entity is known
understand理解—i.e., to understand why a particular name or
title, or form of name or title, has been chosen as the preferred name or title
for the entity.
為什麼會選擇這個名字或書名
根據ifla functional requirements for authority data
＊Key features
RDA provides
a flexible and extensible framework for the description of resources produced
and disseminated using digital technologies while also serving the needs of
agencies organizing resources produced in non-digital formats. RDA是一個框架
RDA is
designed to take advantage of the efficiencies and flexibility in data capture,
storage, retrieval, and display made possible with new database technologies.
RDA is also designed to be compatible with the legacy technologies still used
in many resource discovery applications. 用新的科技但要可以容納舊的
In RDA, there
is a clear line of separation between the guidelines and instructions on
recording data and those on the presentation of data. This separation has been
established in order to optimize flexibility in the storage and display of the
data produced using RDA. Guidelines and instructions on recording data are
covered in chapters 1 through 37; those on the presentation of data are covered
in appendices D and E..
＊RDA的目錄
總共有十篇，37個章節
Appendices 附錄
² A: Capitalization
附錄A 大寫 EX.國家要大寫的
² B: Abbreviations
附錄B 縮寫 縮寫的規定
² C: Initial Articles
附錄C 頭文字 冠詞注入資料
² D: Record Syntaxes for Descriptive Data
附錄D 描述資料的語法
² E: Record Syntaxes for Access Point Control
附錄E 控制檢索項的語法
² F: Additional Instructions on Names of Persons
附錄F 人名的用法
² G: Titles of Nobility, Terms of Rank, Etc.
附錄G 貴族、階級的頭銜
² H: Dates in the Christian Calendar
附錄H 基督曆法的日子 西元紀元
² I: Relationship Designators: Relationships Between a Resource and
Persons, Families, and Corporate Bodies Associated with the Resource
附錄I 關係指數：資源和個人、家族與團體機構的關係
² J: Relationship Designators: Relationships Between Works,
Expressions, Manifestations, and Items
附錄J 關係指數：作品、表現形、載體呈現與單件的關係
² K: Relationship Designators: Relationships Between Persons,
Families, and Corporate Bodies
附錄K 關係指數：個人、家族與團體機構的關係
² L: Relationship Designators: Relationships Between Concepts,
Objects, Events, and Places
附錄 L 關係指數：概念、物件、事件與地點的關係
Glossary 術語
＊Alignment with FRAD(0.3.3)
The
RDA data elements for describing entities associated with a resource generally
reflect the attributes and relationships associated with the entities person,
family, corporate body, and place, as defined in FRAD.
＊0.4.2Objectives
0.4.2.1
Responsiveness to User Needs
0.4.2.2
Cost Efficiency
0.4.2.3
Flexibility 書目資料應該要獨立於store 不只在自己電腦可以使用 別的國家也可溝通
Continuity 資料要跟既有的資料庫要能長合在一起(相容)
＊0.4.3 Principles
0.4.3.1
Differentiation差異性
0.4.3.2
Sufficiency足夠去滿足使用者需求
0.4.3.3
Relationships彼此之間的關係 有意義的關係
0.4.3.
Representation
0.4.3.5
Accuracy
0.4.3.6
Attribution
0.4.3.7
Common Usage or Practice
0.4.3.8
Uniformity
沒有留言:
張貼留言